Lawyer actor opened details of the proceedings.

Vitalina Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya and Armen Dzhigarkhanyan

Photo: Social Networks

In the media there’s a new comment of the lawyer of Armen Dzhigarkhanyan on the investigation of the circumstances of the acquisition of his ex-wife, Vitalina Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya of real estate. Defenders of the actor suspect that the ex-spouse could “plant” an actor for the potent sedative drugs. Under the effects of the drugs he allegedly agreed to withdraw large sums of money from his account, and then voluntarily gave them Vitalina. She then invested the money in purchase of apartments, which were made out to himself. Armen Borisovich, according to representatives, rest assured that you will have a share in the acquired property. Of the ownership documents, he apparently, before the scandal is not seen.

“Armen Borisovich was in such, to put it mildly, not very good condition. Was not focused, not understand what to do and what is happening. During a search Vitalina seized vials of drugs that he absolutely can not be hard. We are going to conduct the examination, confirming that Armen Borisovich was administered these drugs,” said the lawyer.

It is reported that Vitalina instead of injections of insulin could injections of drugs acting on the psyche of the artist. In support of this version, the clothes Armen Borisovich check for traces of the above drugs. In addition, the lawyers ex-wife I suspect that Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya could be an accomplice who allegedly directed her actions.

“As soon as I have reliable information about who is behind this woman, I will tell about it. Counselor she is, — quotes Evgeny Parfenov kp.ru. I’ll call while the Advisor. I have information, but they are still unconfirmed. Will find out soon. Think all secrets will be revealed!”

At the same time, the lawyer Vitalina — Larisa Shirokova made a counter statement. “The prosecution Vitalina presented in the case of interference in the private life of Armen Dzhigarkhanyan. Criminal case about fraud no. We have prepared counter-arguments for all the declared positions of the charges. Vitalina did not put hidden cameras. It is a Department of the city of Moscow in 2015 is obliged to provide all theatres with monitoring, including the office Manager. We intend to finish this case: it is not a crime. It is charged with not only video but also collection and dissemination of personal information. However, no evidence of this! As for the suspected fraud, the public is deliberately misled. Checking account, the money held in the banks, on the card, it’s the law is the common property of the spouses!”