The court remanded the case for reconsideration. Vadim Kazachenko is going to get the unfinished part of the house and the land. His wife Olga had previously won the dispute about what the property is owned by her grandmother in law.

For a year and a half Vadim Kazachenko argues with his wife Olga. Initially, he wanted to recognize the marriage invalid and the court proceedings have married his producer Irina Amanti. He recently filed for divorce from Olga, who bore him a son, Philip. However, the couple has property, vyzyvayuschee heated debate. House in the suburbs, Olga rewrote the grandmother. A man tries to prove that this was done illegally and he has the right to claim half of the property.

“The court sided with Vadim Kazachenko Irina Amanti, and therefore the documents will be forwarded in the first instance for a new test,” said lawyer Irina Panasyuk, Valeriy “StarHit”.

According to the lawyer, the part of the house was built on the money of Irina Amanti. As it turned out, she gave money to the artist that he put in the cottage, being married to Olga. Valery said that they have documents which prove the involvement of Irene to the construction site.

Olga talked about the fact that her family sold the apartment in order to build a house. Moreover, the spouse Kozachenko confessed that the artist and refused to do their share in the cottage, but then changed his mind and decided to divide property.

“We have previously won the dispute, then acknowledged that the grandmother is the legal owner. For some time Vadim was talking about how that is not relevant to this house. And now he says that he invested in real estate,” said Olga “StarHit”.

It is unknown how much time it will take the judges to, once again, to understand all the circumstances of the case. Panasyuk said that they have new documents that can help in the matter of real estate. It confuses the fact that Olga did not provide reports on the receipt of funds from the sale of the apartment. He does not deny that the contract of sale is concluded, and the Bank document on the transfer of the said amount is not seen, although the woman claims in its existence.