The court rejected an appeal against the arrest of 1 million rubles.
Photo: New person
The Moscow city court rejected the appeal
security arrest placed in the Bank money in the amount of 1 million rubles,
owned by the former spouse of Armen Dzhigarkhanyan Vitalina Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya.
“The decision of Cheremushkinsky court from 29 November 2017 to recognize the legal”,
— announced the decision of the judge.
Earlier it was reported that the court ruled so
called “protective” seizure of property Vitalina Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya. It was about the apartment on the
Molodogvardeiskaya street and the Bank account opened in the name of the ex-wife of Armen Dzhigarkhanyan, where 1 million rubles.
The lawyer of the pianist confirmed this information. With Vitalina also have a subscription to
bail, with charges on article not yet filed.
“The Metropolitan court has arrested the
the defendant at Molodogvardeiskaya street in Moscow in the framework of the criminal case on
the violation of privacy. In addition, the court imposed
a security arrest on 1 million roubles, which is located in the safe Deposit box
The Bank also owns and Vitalina”, quotes Larisa Shirokova TASS.
real estate and money Vitalina was imposed on charges of “violation
the inviolability of private life.” Supposedly Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya collected and
disseminated in the press without the consent of the former husband Armen Borisovich details
his personal life. Earlier it was reported that in the personal office of actor was
installed a hidden camera. According to Vitalina, the appearance of these devices
the theater was associated with the order “from above”. But surrounded by Dzhigarkhanyan sure
what Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya acted in their own interests.
“I have to comment on what is happening, because nothing “sensational”,
as stated in the press, did not happen, — said Vitalina after it was
announced the court’s decision. — So the court had to consider a complaint against
the decision of Cheremushkinsky court, filed by me and Larisa, shirokovoy illegal
the withdrawal in November (or December) 2017 cash from my Bank
cell. Was actually looking for fake documents about the fraudulent transactions
real estate, but for lack of them decided to withdraw at least the money. Article
which is under investigation, does not provide for such sanctions and all that
contrary to law, we will appeal to all possible instances in
procedure. In fact, the meeting was postponed because of
late notification (minimum 7 days), and in our case — full
the lack of notification Cheremushkinskaya court me and my lawyer on the term
meeting. However, about any procedural action of the court, we were not
notified never. On
the excavation accidentally found out a month later”.