Angelina Jolie and brad pitt came to an agreement on the issue of custody of children

Анджелина Джоли и Брэд Питт пришли к соглашению по вопросу опеки над детьми

A representative for Angelina Jolie has officially stated that his client and her husband decided the issue of custody over their six children.

Angelina Jolie (Angelina Jolie) and brad pitt (Brad Pitt) finally settled the question of custody of their children: adopted Maddox (Maddox Jolie-Pitt), Pakcom by Tien (Pax Thien Jolie-Pitt) and Saharai (Zahara Jolie-Pitt) and biological Shiloh (Shiloh Jolie-Pitt), Knox (Knox Jolie-Pitt) and Vivienne (Vivienne Jolie-Pitt). Jolie asked for sole custody with the possibility of a meeting between father and children. Later, the Department of children and families County of Los Angeles in connection with the investigation on the accusation of brad pitt in the harsh treatment of children insisted that the actor met with children only in the presence of a physician. Recently, the portal TMZ reported that pitt has filed a lawsuit asking for joint custody.

The representative of Jolie in an official statement, the portal JustJared said that the actors for more than a week ago signed an agreement on custody.

“We can confirm that the experts on children’s issues endorsed a legal agreement that has been accepted accepted and signed by both parties more than a week ago. In accordance with this agreement six children will remain under the care of their mother, but will continue therapeutic visits with their father. This decision was taken on the advice of the professionals and children,” said the actress.

“We can’t discuss the details. Now we hope, on the understanding that the interests of the affected children. All parties aimed at improving family relationships, so we once again ask for your understanding in this difficult time”, — said the representative of Angelina Jolie.

Brad pitt and Angelina Jolie were together for 12 years, including the last two years was married. Divorce papers filed by the actress that the official reason for the gap noted “irreconcilable differences”.