SCANDAL: Lera Kudryavtseva revealed the deception in the show “the Secret in a million”

СКАНДАЛ: Лера Кудрявцева  раскрыла обман в шоу «Секрет на миллион»
Leading the program betrayed the secret of her success.

Lera Kudryavtseva

Photo: Mark Steinbock

The show “the Secret in a million” on NTV, the leading of which is insightful Lera Kudryavtseva called a major television hit of the season. And it’s no wonder! Celebrity of the first magnitude come into the Studio and answering tricky and frankly personal questions leading, reveal its secrets, thus earning money. The more revelations, the more you will win. It is no secret that the stars are moving away from Kudryavtseva with impressive amounts: the maximum “prey” (one million rubles), the project left the assumption and Love Philip. Just
the show was 23 celebrity.

The audience was amazed and delighted by the information that
gave their idols: it seemed that the rich and famous really turning the soul inside out. It appears, however, that not everything in the show “the Secret in a million” is so transparently, easily and unexpectedly.
Many suspect that these most secret questions star advance familiar, all negotiated and professionally orchestrated. In a recent interview with Lera Kudryavtseva lifted the veil
the mysteries: the secrets of Kirkorov
the editors worked six months.

It turns out that the secrets of the stars the crew from “million dollar Secret” knows in advance
they ask questions and already know what answer you get. Thus the air goes out the intriguing program that you look
millions.

As it became known 7days.ru, the openness of the program has its price: for participation in the project star have not only the amount that they “won”, but decent fee. Crew members of the “million dollar Secret”, for obvious reasons did not want to give their names, said that for the public parade of skeletons in the closet celebrities receive remuneration in the amount of 300 to 600 thousand rubles. The first is a formal part of the money — guests Lera Kudryavtseva spend for charity (for which then openly accountable to viewers), the second part — on personal needs.