Vitalina Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya calls slander charges in the address. According to the pianist, she does not return Studio apartment Armen Dzhigarkhanyan, as said earlier, each artist Artur Soghomonyan. In the future Vitalina intends to punish the offenders, discrediting her honor and dignity.
Armen Dzhigarkhanyan continues to clash with his ex-wife Vitalina Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya. In early April, the media reported that the ex-wife of the master returned to his odnushku in the village of Glukhovo. A similar statement was made by the friend Armen Borisovich Arthur Soghomonyan. According to him, the pianist was afraid of charges under article 137 of the Criminal code (“Violation of privacy”). In addition, Soghomonyan suspected Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya in the forgery of the signature. Vitalina itself continues to deny any allegations that cast doubt on her reputation. To share his version of the resonant events, she became the heroine of the program “Let them talk”.
Ex-wife Dzhigarkhanyan returned him to the apartment
“We have no dialogue with Armen Borisovich, so I couldn’t give the apartment. Larissa anatolevny (lawyer Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya – Ed.) have any questions about this transaction,” said Vitalina.
Each Dzhigarkhanyan, Yuri Sherling said the master refers to his ex-wife. According to the Director, he has no plans to accept Vitalinea.
“I talked to Armen about this. Unfortunately, he is highly categorically. He argues that Vitalina behaved most neblagoobraznye way. Armen says that she was stealing money from him and otherwise duped. Any mention Vitalina leads him into a frenzy. According to Armen, he made a huge mistake of trusting their feelings”, – said Sherling.
Friend Armen Borisovich was trying to reconcile it with Vitalino. However, even after six months from the beginning of the scandal, the actor does not intend to forgive his ex-wife. “I said, “come on, maybe it was a mistake”. He replied: “You have to understand that it was my love, but I was deceived,” – said Sherling. According to the friend of the master, he “goes on”.
Ex-wife Dzhigarkhanyan said that all her papers are thoroughly checked by law enforcement authorities. Pianist suspects apartment in Glukhovo got. illegally.
“None of the prosecution Armen Borisovich was not confirmed, – says Vitalina. – This Studio apartment was re-issued in a fraudulent manner. Unfortunately, at the moment, Armen Borisovich is an interested party. I didn’t mind to give him, but we have not been negotiated. The alienation took place without my knowledge or consent. When I was married, I always acted in the interests of our family.”
In addition, Vitalina assured those present in the Studio that is not engaged in the illegal re-registration of odnushki on yourself. Earlier this property was owned by Arthur Soghomonyan. The businessman claims that she forged his signature. Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya denies the veracity of such information. According to Vitalina, Dzhigarkhanyan called to the Soghomonyan.
“He said, “Arthur, please, renew this apartment for Vitalinu”. I never forged documents, I believe that’s his signature. Then Arthur handed the papers through the lawyer or the driver. This deal was fully carried out by the company-Builder” – says the ex-wife of the famous Director.
Lawyer Vitalina Larisa Shirokova also joined the discussion of the controversial history. According to the lawyer Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya, they are outraged by the proliferation in the media of private information.
“De facto and de jure the apartment came back into the possession of Armen Borisovich. Deserves attention the other method returns this apartment. Vitalina V. did not give her. Moreover, information on real estate Armen Borisovich quite strangely closed to the public. Of course, it is illegal, we will appeal,” – said Shirokov.
The lawyer said that for the past few months, the pianist is free to move from-for brought against it criminal case. Offenders Vitalina, said her representative, must be punished. She Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya added that Dzhigarkhanyan demanded to be put in jail and Tatiana Vlasova. “He had good lawyers and me. We explained to him that under the law this cannot be done,” she recalls.
“The subject of our meeting – the same criminal case. Now, to my law satisfied, we can talk about what struck back. We didn’t waste any time. Next week, perhaps by the end of this, our statements will be started testing. Individuals who were handing out loud interview with facts, and untrue, and defamed my client, finally will be called to criminal responsibility, and I am certainly glad. Moreover, you will not see tears and tantrums, it is not our way. All the tears that were shed, were shed behind closed doors,” he shared in turn, the representative Tsymbalyuk-Romanovskaya.